Firefox HTML Rendering

[Joel Bryan Juliano]

On 2/16/07, David Farning <dfarning at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 10:28 +0800, Joel Bryan Juliano wrote:
>
> > If only Firefox would be as high quality as Epiphany, then I'm not
> > going to use Epiphany.
> > The problem is everything is linked up and compiled with Firefox like
> > an adware in Ubuntu,
> > but all the devs know that it's possible to progress with this
> > unpliant approach right from the start.
> > There are xulrunner, which the Debian mainstream have already been
> > compiled in and been using in their
> > GNOME desktop without the adware.
> >
>
> What do you mean by firefox in ubuntu is an adware?  Do you feel their
> is too much Ubuntu branding


If a user want only to have Epiphany as his browser, he can't, he'll have to
live the fact that Firefox cannot be removed in his computer in Ubuntu, or
else, everything will break.

> I think people should think more about typesetting, rendering, and
> > quality of the documents they worked on rather than the popularity of
> > the application they use, I believe FOSS exists not just to provide an
> > alternative, but a high quality alternative application that can do
> > their jobs without loosing the quality of their work.
> >
> Since you are concerned about the quality of firefox, please consider
> joining us on the ubuntu-mozillateam.  We are currently looking for
> triagers, wiki maintainers, and devs.
>
> thanks
>
> --
> David Farning <dfarning at gmail.com>
>
>


-- 
Carpe Diem
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20070216/e0162781/attachment.html>