Sharing files between Ubuntu 6.06 and Windows XP Pro - best disk format to use
Derek Broughton
news at pointerstop.ca
Mon Feb 5 14:00:26 UTC 2007
Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> In summary, it's mostly because it's not self-journaling and thus
> (relatively) easy to corrupt and fragment. However, I'll repeat that I
> haven't had any real *problems*
True. Its drawbacks are also its advantages. It's simple. I wouldn't want
to do real work on it, and since my only use for Windows is Quicken , the
only data I want in Windows I definitely _don't_ want on FAT, but I have
used FAT partitions for moving data around.
--
derek
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list