WMA
Bart Silverstrim
bsilver at chrononomicon.com
Tue Dec 11 14:57:50 UTC 2007
andy baxter wrote:
> Bart Silverstrim wrote:
>> Caleb Marcus wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Ugh, ONLY records to WMA? I'd look at another recorder... that's just
>>> annoying. Another thing is that you may lose quality by converting a
>>> lossy format, WMA, to another lossy format, mp3.
>>>
>> But for the price, the reviews are actually very good for the unit. AND
>> it acts as a drive...apparently a lot of the DVR's use software for
>> transfers, this one has a USB plug built right in so no cables are
>> needed, and the Linux generic USB driver works with it!
>>
>>
> Ah, but if you buy this then not only are you getting a piece of kit
> that's going to be awkward to use with linux, you're also encouraging
> Olympus to carry on making voice recorders that use proprietory formats.
If awkward is just a matter of using mplayer or VLC to convert from one
format to another in a few minutes, that is really not anywhere near as
much hassle as what other options offer for a low price. It records in
WMA format, but plays back mp3's and WMA's. Maybe it's a licensing
issue. Maybe it's a partner issue. If all it takes to get it to work is
a few minutes of processing initially from a console then that's really
not worth raising a ruckus over in my book, especially when they've made
it mass-usb compatible (so it works like a flash drive) and it gets
otherwise good reviews in sound quality and usability and the conversion
process isn't something I'm forced to buy a third-party software package
to fix.
If it were DRM'd or required special software then I'd not spend the money.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list