Was feisty really ready to release ?

Keith Richie disturbed1976 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 25 02:00:57 UTC 2007


On 4/24/07, Ouattara Oumar Aziz <wattazoum at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, I'd disagree with Frank that they aren't stable (at least edgy - I
> > still haven't tried feisty, but I have faith that it will be worth
> > installing) but they're specifically not recommended for crucial
> > applications - that comes with an implication that there will be glitches
> > that should not occur in Dapper.  If, as Frank, you really like stability,
> > the LTS versions are the way to go - and they still have a release
> > frequency likely to beat Debian.
>
> Don't you agree that the flow of problem reported on this mailing list
> increased drastically ?
> (That's my impression at least :-/ )
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>

Flow of problem reporting increased? Not even close.

I'm subscribed to this mailing list and a few Debian lists. Just the
general Debian list (not the bugs list) has a 3:1 traffic ratio.
Meaning that for every 100 posts here there a 300 in Debian.

I can honestly say that over 80% of the errors I've seen reported for
Ubuntu and Debian are PEBKAC errors.




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list