vista

Steve Flynn anothermindbomb at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 14:21:16 UTC 2006


On 17/10/06, jonathan <jonathan at logical.co.zw> wrote:
>
> Microsofts "policy" is in direct violation of the Law...
> Reader post by: Gayle Edwards
> Posted on: October 16, 2006, 6:26 PM PDT
> Story: Microsoft limits Vista transfers
> The "U.S. Supreme Court" has already ruled that customers DO "own" the
> software that they buy.
>
> Despite Microsofts (and its perennial "defenders", or should I say
> "shills") claims, Microsofts, "EULAs" (End User License Agreements)
> CANNOT "...trump the law". MOST "legal experts" (and quite a few
> Attorney-Generals) seem to agree, quite conclusively, on this point.


[snip]
>


Are these your words or the words of Gayle Edwards (who SEEMS... to have
SOMETHING... "wrong" with... "HER" keyboard).

What the US supreme court says carries no weight whatsoever anywhere else in
the world. Whether you see this is a good or a bad thing is another thing
entirely! :)


-- 
Steve
Despair - It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20061017/f964187c/attachment.html>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list