this mailing list
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Wed Nov 29 22:54:14 UTC 2006
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:28:16 -0700 Scott <geekboy at angrykeyboarder.com>
>Scott Kitterman spake thusly on 11/29/2006 12:26 PM:
>> On Wednesday 29 November 2006 14:20, Ouattara Oumar Aziz wrote:
>>> Not really,
>>> I use another SMTP server . See, when Gmail find that the SMTP server
>>> sending the mail is itself and the sender is you, it take it like a bug
>>> which would create a loop so it doesn't take it on the mailbox.
>>> a solution is to use a different SMTP server to send your mail (even
>>> though it's with the gmail address) . But i kinda think there was a
>>> setting you would do in gmail to get those mail ... hmm.. I don't
>>> remember at all
>> Well, except that Gmail publishes an SPF record saying where authorized
>> comes from:
>> $ dig -ttxt gmail.com
>> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> -ttxt gmail.com
>> ;; global options: printcmd
>> ;; Got answer:
>> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 7878
>> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
>> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>> ;gmail.com. IN TXT
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> gmail.com. 224 IN TXT "v=spf1
>> ;; Query time: 11 msec
>> ;; SERVER: 192.168.111.254#53(192.168.111.254)
>> ;; WHEN: Wed Nov 29 14:23:46 2006
>> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 71
>> This means that sending from another SMTP server is going to look
>> to some. See:
>I have to say that this is the only fault I find with Gmail. Otherwise
>it's miles ahead of the competition.
>But I find it a *big* problem. So much so that I abandoned Gmail for use
>with mailing lists. There have been numerous complaints to Google on
>the subject and I've read discussions on the subject several times in
>Google is convinced that it's a "feature". I don't know of anyone else
I gather 'it' is Gmail filtering out your list posts, not Gmail having an SPF record?
Mailman has a similar (it filters out mailing list posts that you are directly addressed on)
feature that works on a per subscriber basis. It was default on for, I think, one release.
The outcry was substantial and it now defaults to off. I know of no one that's turned it on.
I'd say that supports your position.
More information about the ubuntu-users