Why Rhythmbox instead of Banshee?

Luis lemsx1 at gmail.com
Sat Nov 4 19:48:27 UTC 2006

On 10/29/06, Adriano Varoli Piazza <moranar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/29/06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang at gmail.com> wrote:
> What's wrong with Rhythmbox, might I ask? It doesn't ask for the Mono
> runtime, it's stable, actively developed and with its plugins it does
> more or less all I want from it.
> I'm going to try Banshee, nonetheless.

Depending on how you defined "stable". Stable as in "released" or as
in "it works".

For me Rhythmbox NEVER works. It always crashes at random files for no
particular reason.

I switched to Banshee and lo and behold. Everything is polished.
Everything works. And it feels like Rhythmbox (the interface).
Excellent piece of software. I have not seen it crash once (Ubuntu

Luis Mondesi
*NIX Guru

"Feliz el hombre que ha hallado sabiduria y el hombre que consigue
discernimiento, porque el tenerla como ganancia es mejor que tener la
plata como ganancia; y el tenerla como producto, [mejor] que el oro
mismo" (Prov 3:13-14).

More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list