Evolution

[ruscook]

Chanchao wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 18:03 -0400, Me - Atlantic wrote:
>
>   
>> On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 23:26 +0200, Michaël Van Dorpe wrote:
>>     
>>> On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 17:07 -0400, Me - Atlantic wrote:
>>>       
>>>> If top-posting is so bad, then, why don't *nix mail clients
>>>>  automatically go to the bottom of the message when replying?
>>>>         
>>> My guess: because you first have to delete the stuff that is irrelevant
>>> for your reply.
>>>       
>
>   
>> Deleting stuff?  In corporate emails? That would be a definite - no.
>>     
>
> Guess Outlook is to blame for that mindset..   It really makes much more
> sense in emails to quote a bit of the question/statement you're replying
> to.  Instead corporate emails are like letters by themselves, and then
> quote 10 miles of previous emails with every single reply. 
>
> Ludicrous.
>
> Cheers,
> Chanchao
>   
Of course you can delete stuff in your reply to only reply to what's 
relevant. The original received message is still kept and archived to 
show exactly what was received.

-- 
Kind Regards Russell
==================
www.windsorcycles.com.au
bikes.no-ip.info
Linux user #369094
================== 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ruscook_oz.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 127 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060526/1b05ca04/attachment.vcf>