Java compatibility? (was Re: Not a bash, just the facts)

Daniel Carrera daniel.carrera at zmsl.com
Sun Mar 26 08:22:56 UTC 2006


Michael T. Richter wrote:
> This translates to "Java is backwards-compatible, except where it 
> isn't", Alan.  That's not resoundingly persuasive.  ;)

AFAIK nothing is absolutely backwards compatibile (okay, TeX after 
version 3.0, but that's it). AFAIK Java is *very* backwards compatible. 
That compatibility is one of its strongest selling points.

Cheers,
Daniel
-- 
      /\/`) http://opendocumentfellowship.org
     /\/_/
    /\/_/   A life? Sounds great!
    \/_/    Do you know where I could download one?
    /




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list