Java compatibility? (was Re: Not a bash, just the facts)
Daniel Carrera
daniel.carrera at zmsl.com
Sun Mar 26 08:22:56 UTC 2006
Michael T. Richter wrote:
> This translates to "Java is backwards-compatible, except where it
> isn't", Alan. That's not resoundingly persuasive. ;)
AFAIK nothing is absolutely backwards compatibile (okay, TeX after
version 3.0, but that's it). AFAIK Java is *very* backwards compatible.
That compatibility is one of its strongest selling points.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
/\/`) http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/
/\/_/ A life? Sounds great!
\/_/ Do you know where I could download one?
/
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list