Java compatibility? (was Re: Not a bash, just the facts)

Michael T. Richter ttmrichter at gmail.com
Sun Mar 26 03:14:44 UTC 2006


On Sat, 2006-25-03 at 21:44 -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:

> >> Java is backwards-compatible.
> >> One exception: deprecated features.



> > This translates to "Java is backwards-compatible, except where it
> > isn't", Alan.  That's not resoundingly persuasive.  ;)



> Has any deprecated feature ever actually been removed?


I don't know.  I've been avoiding Java as much as possible.  I was
commenting on Alan's wording, not on Java.  The wording was "Java is
backwards-compatible except where it isn't."

Personally I think that backwards-compatibility of programming languages
is a shibboleth (as is the whole idea of "cross-platform code" -- but
that's another holy cow entirely).  So Java not being
backwards-compatible isn't particularly important for me even were I to
use Java.

--
Michael T. Richter
Email: ttmrichter at gmail.com, mtr1966 at hotpop.com
MSN: ttmrichter at hotmail.com, mtr1966 at hotmail.com; YIM:
michael_richter_1966; AIM: YanJiahua1966; ICQ: 241960658; Jabber:
mtr1966 at jabber.cn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060326/bd6f66b5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060326/bd6f66b5/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list