Java compatibility? (was Re: Not a bash, just the facts)

Michael T. Richter ttmrichter at gmail.com
Sun Mar 26 01:29:13 UTC 2006


On Sun, 2006-26-03 at 02:59 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

> Java is backwards-compatible.



> One exception: deprecated features.


This translates to "Java is backwards-compatible, except where it
isn't", Alan.  That's not resoundingly persuasive.  ;)

--
Michael T. Richter
Email: ttmrichter at gmail.com, mtr1966 at hotpop.com
MSN: ttmrichter at hotmail.com, mtr1966 at hotmail.com; YIM:
michael_richter_1966; AIM: YanJiahua1966; ICQ: 241960658; Jabber:
mtr1966 at jabber.cn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060326/d8098e73/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smiley-4.png
Type: image/png
Size: 822 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060326/d8098e73/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060326/d8098e73/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list