GPL compliance
deanlinkous
ulist at gs1.ubuntuforums.org
Fri Jun 30 19:08:00 UTC 2006
That is the reason why a distro that provides the binary cd for free
will go the written offer so they CAN charge something for the source
even if it is just actual cost.
Whereas a distro that charges for the binary cd should go for the
equivalent access charge instead.
Plus that three year requirement of the written offer thing is a burden
IMO. I am surprised Ubuntu goes this route.
--
deanlinkous
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list