On 21/06/06, Gary W. Swearingen <garys at opusnet.com> wrote: > Since this silly sub-thread isn't long enough yet, I'll note that "/>" > is not HTML, AFAIK. (I welcome correction, say, if current version > of HTML and XHTML are two names for the same thing.) > It's perfectly acceptable in HTML, though not required. Dotan Cohen http://gmail-com.com 33