k7-smp kernel help
kenneth.l.armstrong at us.army.mil
kenneth.l.armstrong at us.army.mil
Sun Jun 18 04:14:50 UTC 2006
Nope, no overclocking. Temps are running at around 39 degrees (I have a huge 92 mm Zalman fan on this thing, along with Arctic Silver 5 thermal paste). Temps aren't a problem. I can run this machine for hours in either Windows x64 bit edition or the 386 kernel in Ubuntu with no issues. It's just when I try to jump to a new kernel. So that's why I am positive it is a software issue somewhere. And yeah, I ran 2 memory tests and they both came up clean as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com>
Date: Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:56 pm
Subject: Re: k7-smp kernel help
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:14:18 -0400 Kenny
> <kenneth.l.armstrong at us.army.mil>
> wrote:
> >Kenny wrote:
> >> Matthew Kuiken wrote:
> >>> Kenny wrote:
> >>>> OK, I have been at this for about 6 hours now.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have an AMD X2 4400+ dual core processor. I have been
> trying to
> >>>> use the k7-smp kernel so that I can actually use both of my
> cores. I
> >>>> went into synaptic package manager, and of course it
> automatically
> >>>> chooses all of the latest pieces needed, including the
> appropriate
> >>>> restricted modules (I have 2 7800GTX's in SLI mode, so I need
> the
> >>>> Nvidia drivers).
> >>>>
> >>>> It all downloads and installs fine (the kernel that it
> defaults to
> >>>> download is 2.6.15.25-k7). But after about 2-5 minutes of use
> after
> >>>> I boot into this kernel and log in, my entire computer locks
> up.
> >>>> Mouse doesn't move, keyboard shortcuts don't respond. I have
> to
> >>>> manually reboot with the power button. Reminds me of the days
> of
> >>>> Windows 3.1.
> >>>>
> >>>> So I thought that I would step it back and get the previous
> kernel
> >>>> (2.6.15-23-k7). But when I try to download it, synaptic wants
> to
> >>>> automatically put all of the latest software with it that
> depend on
> >>>> the newer kernel. I couldn't get it to cooperate, so I
> figured, what
> >>>> the hell, I'll try it.
> >>>>
> >>>> I reboot, choose the older kernel, and after the Ubuntu
> loading
> >>>> screen, I get the X failure screen telling me that it
> couldn't start
> >>>> X. I figured that this was because the restricted modules
> wanted to
> >>>> work with the newer kernel and not this one.
> >>>>
> >>>> So I reboot again, this time to the newer k7 kernel (2.6.15-
> 25-k7)
> >>>> only to find that after the Ubuntu loading screen, nothing
> gets sent
> >>>> to my monitor. My LCD power light goes orange dictating that
> it is
> >>>> no longer recieving a signal from my video cards.
> >>>>
> >>>> The only way I can work in Ubuntu is to use the latest 386
> kernel,
> >>>> and that sucks because I'm running on only half of my
> physical cpu
> >>>> hardware.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there a better way to do this? I've tried the sudo apt-
> get, but
> >>>> it does the same exact thing as synaptic, getting all of the
> latest
> >>>> stuff, not letting me have anything older.
> >>>>
> >>>> Suggestions?
> >>>>
> >>>> Kenny
> >>>>
> >>> You may want to try the 686 kernel. It also has SMP enabled.
> It may
> >>> not be as optimized for your processor, but it should still
> allow you
> >>> to use both. Hopefully it will be a bit more stable.
> >>>
> >>> HTH,
> >>> -Matt
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Thanks, I gave it a shot but unfortunately it was even less
> stable
> >> than the k7 version. What's up with dual core in Linux?
> >>
> >Wow, I'm even more sad than before. Just for grins and giggles I
> tried
> >the regular k7 kernel, and it locked up as well but I was able to
> move
> >the mouse. It appears that I may have something else going on
> here.
> >The only kernel that I can use that doesn't cause a lockup is the
> >regular 386 one. Where do I begin to try and figure out what's
> wrong?>
> If I were in your position, I'd be thinking about the potential
> for
> hardware issues.
>
> Are you overclocking at all?
>
> If you boot to your BIOS settings, can you check CPU temps? Are
> the
> reasonable for K7 (I wouldn't know)?
>
> I'm particularly wondering about CPU thermal issues. IIRC, AMD
> CPUs freeze
> when they overheat. I'd also iimagine they run cooler on one core
> instead
> of two.
>
> The earlier suggestion about running a memory test was a good one,
> I think.
>
> I'm running the latest SMP kernel on dual Pentium IIIs, so I don't
> think
> it's fundamentally broken.
>
> Scott K
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list