Suspend2 (Dagobah's packages)

[Alexander Skwar]

· Christofer C. Bell <christofer.c.bell at gmail.com>:

> On 7/27/06, Alexander Skwar <listen at alexander.skwar.name> wrote:
>> · Christofer C. Bell <christofer.c.bell at gmail.com>:
>>
>> > you."  So I think unless someone plans to propose to the technical
>> > committee something more convincing than "but it's better because, um,
>> > because I said!" then it's not going to change.
>>
>> Is "it works and the in-kernel code doesn't work" convincing
>> enough?
> 
> No, it's not convincing enough.

Ah, so it's better to ship something, which is NOT working?

Well, I disagree.

> Replacing the suspend code 

Who's talking about *REPLACING*? The kernel can very well be compiled
with BOTH suspend codes. So, it's rather that something is ADDED.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Frißt die Katze deine Maus, ist's auch mit dem Windows aus.