Ubuntu a poor choice for servers

[Qiuli Han]

if u really want a reliable server, go for the BSD family
if u want a easy server, go for SuSE
if u want a server which u need spend time play with, go for ubuntu

On 7/11/06, Joao Inacio <jcinacio at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/11/06, Joao Inacio <jcinacio at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > For me, consistency == debian, period. i haven't used slackware,
> > gentoo or the likes simply because i think src-based distros involve
> > too much work and time.
> >
> > Debian isn't for everyone, but there is a great deal of good
> > documentation and after everything is set up right it's a breeze to
> > maintain. Also, apt simply RULES (i haven't used any rpm-based distro
> > after it)
> >
> >
> > This doesn't mean anyone can use it if he/she doesn't have the
> > knowlege or can invest a large ammount of time reading documentation.
> >
>
> Quick note: when i say debian i really mean ubuntu as first choice due
> to the somewhat easier install/maintain process and better package
> selection. (debian stable packages are sometimes too old for my
> personal taste)
>
> --
> João Inácio
> http://www.jcinacio.com
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>