Ubuntu is not free.
Alexander Skwar
listen at alexander.skwar.name
Sat Jul 8 13:03:36 UTC 2006
use_real_email_ulist at ohiggins.ubuntu.com schrieb:
> Ubuntu was free for me, didn't pay a thing, No one is asking for money
> for usage.
That's just one of the meanings of free. The other meaning is IMO
more important.
>> and we don't need non free
>> firmwares pollution in the default kernel packages.
>>
> bah. it's free. I still didn't pay for it
That's clearly not what he meant.
> If it was so easy, why isn't Linux number one now? "it just works"
> Ubuntu team does a fine fine job. Those who nit-pick about non-free
> this, non-free that...go use gentoo or slack..
What about Gentoo? On Gentoo, I never had to care that much, if
a software is free. Heck, they've even got packages for absolutely
non-free software.
So: What about Gentoo? Feel like picking on Gentoo, as it offers
the users even more freedom than Ubuntu offers?
Alexander Skwar
--
Im Endeffekt war alles cooler als letztes Jahr, obwohl
ich bis Donnerstag dachte, das es nicht geht.
-- Igor Gilitschenski
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list