how to convert to ReiserFS ?
ubuntu at rio.vg
ubuntu at rio.vg
Mon Jul 3 17:03:20 UTC 2006
Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
>> ReiserFS is faster than ext3. ext3 is more stable and better tested.
>
> This means, that ReiserFS is unstable?
>
> Do you have any *CURRENT* prove for that? ReiserFS had some serious
> bugs "way back then", but currently?
>
Well, that's the thing about filesystems... could there still be bugs
lurking around in ReiserFS? Ext3, built on the much older Ext2, has had
a _much_ longer service time and much wider deployment.
Ext3 is _more_ stable, but that does _NOT_ mean that ReiserFS is
UNstable. Reiser is currently used on many large systems and has many
proponents.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list