GPL compliance

[Jack Bowling]

On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 08:59:50PM +0200, Mario Vukelic wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 19:42 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> > The GPL *is*
> > permission to redistribute and re-license 
> 
> Actually it is permission to redistribute. The term "re-license" in this
> context is kinda ambiguous - it could being allowed to rerelease the
> GPL'ed code under another license (which only the actual copyright
> holder(s) can do).  
> I know that you mean the correct thing and it's only an accident, but I
> have to remark on it, otherwise Gary might get even more confused.


For those running procmail, this recipe should put an end to this crap:

:0
* ^(Subject):.*(Re. GPL compliance)
/dev/null


Jack