Ubuntu as a server

[MrKnisely]

Duncan Anderson wrote:

> I should like to know whether it is problematic to use Ubuntu Linux as 
> a host/server. In other words, should there be any problem with 
> installing Ubuntu, enabling the root user login, and configuring the 
> machine as a mail or proxy server or as an SQL server or the like?
>
> It seems to me from reading this mailing list that most people use it 
> as a replacement for Windows. In other words they use it as a 
> workstation or home pc.
>
> Do any of the members of this list have any suggestions, advice, 
> warnings, caveats, or otherwise to offer me regarding Ubuntu's use as 
> a server?
>
> I work with Mandrake, RedHat, SUSe, Debian and FreeBSD machines 
> configured as servers (or hosts, a term which I prefer in the context 
> of UNIX/Linux) as well a various flavours of UNIX. I am curious to 
> find out whether anyone sees Ubuntu as a serious rival to SUSe or RHEL 
> or Mandrake Enterprise or the like.
>
> My gut feeling is that there should be no problem with getting it to 
> act as a reliable back office machine.
>
> The reason I am asking about this is because "Universe" and 
> "Multiverse" software repositories are very impressive, and I like the 
> Debian package management format.
>
> Hoping for a bit of feedback...
>
> Duncan
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! 
> Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a 
> photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
>
>
I run several Ubuntu Servers (Hosts). These include mySQL backed Web 
Server / Email / FTP / VPN Endpoint / etc.

I believe that is is as good as the others you mentioned.

When I setup my servers, I do not use the "server" option provided by 
the install CD. I do a full install and then pull out what I don't want. 
My resoning for this is that I am lazy... nothing more.

Mike K.