Well, Windows is back on the disk.
Sasha Tsykin
stsykin at gmail.com
Thu Jan 19 06:49:32 UTC 2006
James Diehl wrote:
>The world market does a lot of strange things!
>Remember that a big part of it is made up of companies
>and people just like the ones at Microsoft. Enron and
>other companies have proven that there is very little
>ethics associated with them. As long as there are
>OS's like Windows, there will be people who think the
>Sun rises and Sets because of MS, and that Mr. Gates
>is God!
>
>
Are we arguing here about the ethics of Microsoft's conduct or the
quality of windows as an Operating System, because they are quite separate.
Sasha
>--- Sasha Tsykin <stsykin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Richard Colbert Jr wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>"Do you believe that a free market, world wide,
>>>
>>>
>>would permit MS or any other
>>
>>
>>>company to enjoy a multi-billion USD monthly sales
>>>
>>>
>>volume without it
>>
>>
>>>providing products that people desire to have?"
>>>
>>>So your saying that Microsoft makes billions
>>>
>>>
>>monthly because people DESIRE
>>
>>
>>>THEIR CRAP! I don't think so! Everybody I know will
>>>
>>>
>>tell you they ONLY USE
>>
>>
>>>MICROSOFT'S CRAP because:
>>>
>>>a.) They don't want to learn something else (like
>>>
>>>
>>Linux)
>>
>>
>>>b.) Because they have to use it at work
>>>c.) Because people/businesses they deal with use it
>>>d.) or because they are too stupid know they have a
>>>
>>>
>>choice
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>you don't know many people then.
>>
>>
>>
>>>I would be hard pressed to find anyone I know that
>>>
>>>
>>USES IT BECAUSE THEY LIKE
>>
>>
>>>IT.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>I wouldn't.
>>
>>
>>
>>>As far me, I still use Microsoft products, not by
>>>
>>>
>>choice, but rather because
>>
>>
>>>I am too fracking lazy to teach myself the
>>>
>>>
>>intricacies of Linux. However,
>>
>>
>>>thanks to Ubuntu that is changing. I am steadily
>>>
>>>
>>tweaking my iMac (running
>>
>>
>>>Breezy Badger) and as soon as I get all the
>>>
>>>
>>software, games and tools I need
>>
>>
>>>running on it, I will switch to it FULL TIME while
>>>
>>>
>>I get my main computer
>>
>>
>>>(the one I am typing on now) ridden of Microsoft.
>>>
>>>I am tired of the MS BS like them knowing there are
>>>
>>>
>>SERIOUS FLAWS and they
>>
>>
>>>DO NOTHING TO PATCH THEM until it HITS THE MEDIA.
>>>
>>>
>>WTF! Can you imagine how
>>
>>
>>>SCREWED HUMANITY would be if all businesses
>>>
>>>
>>operated like that?
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>a) not very
>>b) RedHat, Suse, and Ximian commisioned a study
>>which found that
>>Microsoft updates are not less frequent than linux
>>ones. (Probably not
>>the conclusion they were looking for) Microsoft
>>release many patches for
>>even more bugs. Only a handful ever hit the media.
>>
>>
>>
>>>What if the US Postal Service discovered the glue
>>>
>>>
>>in their stamps was
>>
>>
>>>poisoning people, but they didn't do anything about
>>>
>>>
>>it until it hit the news
>>
>>
>>>that 10,000 people had died from exposure to
>>>
>>>
>>contaminated stamps. You think
>>
>>
>>>that bird would fly? Hell no! But MS gets away with
>>>
>>>
>>JUST THAT THINKING EVERY
>>
>>
>>>DANG DAY!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>quit ranting, it's becoming boring. Either learn
>>your facts or be quiet.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>>Richard Colbert
>>>
>>>"Recent Ubuntu Convert"
>>>
>>>YIM: cmptrgeeknshermantx
>>>
>>>ICQ: 14466429
>>>
>>>MSN: pcheaven2k at hotmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: ubuntu-users-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>[mailto:ubuntu-users-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com] On
>>>
>>>
>>Behalf Of Lonn
>>
>>
>>>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:36 PM
>>>To: Ubuntu Help and User Discussions
>>>Subject: RE: Well, Windows is back on the disk.
>>>
>>>
>>>I am very pleased with Ubuntu. It offers software
>>>
>>>
>>and functionality that is
>>
>>
>>>not otherwise available or available only at
>>>
>>>
>>significant cost.
>>
>>
>>>The concept of "complaint" can be interpreted as
>>>
>>>
>>inquiry, request for new
>>
>>
>>>features, bug reports, or even dissatisfaction with
>>>
>>>
>>the language of an
>>
>>
>>>instruction. Very experienced people interpret such
>>>
>>>
>>input and adjust the
>>
>>
>>>product when an adjustment best serves the majority
>>>
>>>
>>of users without
>>
>>
>>>creating special "differences" throughout the OS of
>>>
>>>
>>throughout thousands of
>>
>>
>>>programs that run on MS, Linux, or any other
>>>
>>>
>>commercial operating system.
>>
>>
>>>Is WIN better than Ubuntu or vice-versa? They are
>>>
>>>
>>as different as apples
>>
>>
>>>and oranges -- even thought both have GUI user
>>>
>>>
>>interfaces. Both will be
>>
>>
>>>around for a long time and both will get better --
>>>
>>>
>>more powerful -- easier
>>
>>
>>>to install -- easier to use.
>>>
>>>Windows has never been free -- on a new machine or
>>>
>>>
>>by any other means. The
>>
>>
>>>cost is paid by hardware manufacturer and passed
>>>
>>>
>>along to buyers in an
>>
>>
>>>apparently transparent manner. Some persons turn on
>>>
>>>
>>their computer and
>>
>>
>>>object to the MS EULA and apply for a refund of the
>>>
>>>
>>cost of the OS in their
>>
>>
>>>deal and they usually get a refund - laws provide
>>>
>>>
>>for such an option if the
>>
>>
>>>user did not forfeit it in their sale/purchase
>>>
>>>
>>agreement.
>>
>>
>>>In response to another issue -- the claim that MS
>>>
>>>
>>only supports XP is
>>
>>
>>>absolutely incorrect. All of the WINDOWS operating
>>>
>>>
>>systems and office
>>
>>
>>>products are upgradeable to the latest security
>>>
>>>
>>fixes and bug fixes (but you
>>
>>
>>>cannot move to later OS or to higher priced
>>>
>>>
>>alternatives from say WIN98,
>>
>>
>>>98SE, or WIN_ME to such as XP, WINDOWS 2000, or WIN
>>>
>>>
>>XP Professional without
>>
>>
>>>purchasing them).
>>>
>>>It was said in an earlier post of this thread that
>>>
>>>
>>a reinstall of MS to cure
>>
>>
>>>OS problems overwrites all personal files on the
>>>
>>>
>>disk. No so! In fact, a
>>
>>
>>>reinstall of the OS on a working system ordinarily
>>>
>>>
>>will not overwrite OS
>>
>>
>>>files of a later date than those on the disk that
>>>
>>>
>>came with a machine or
>>
>>
>>>came out of a shrink wrapped software box, if
>>>
>>>
>>purchased separately. A
>>
>>
>>>restore point can be set in MS products, at any
>>>
>>>
>>time or at any stage of
>>
>>
>>>stable operation, but normally it's done after
>>>
>>>
>>properly installing new
>>
>>
>>>software or hardware. If new software causes
>>>
>>>
>>problems and cannot be
>>
>>
>>>'uninstalled' the machine can be rolled back to the
>>>
>>>
>>last set restore point
>>
>>
>>>or to an earlier set restore point -- and walla,
>>>
>>>
>>offending software will be
>>
>>
>>>ignored and it will not struggle with new hardware
>>>
>>>
>>if it is removed from the
>>
>>
>>>system. A sidebar to that -- if you install
>>>
>>>
>>software that corrupts your OS
>>
>>
>>>and you were not warned of such risk in the EULA --
>>>
>>>
>>you should sue the
>>
>>
>>>vendor of that product.
>>>
>>>You can, with a little perseverance, talk to a MS
>>>
>>>
>>technician about problems
>>
>>
>>>with your MS software. There is a continuous stream
>>>
>>>
>>of updates coming out of
>>
>>
>>>MS. If you use any of their products, [t is wise to
>>>
>>>
>>know about their update
>>
>>
>>>system and how to use it.
>>>
>>>I am not trolling for WINDOWS. If you make an
>>>
>>>
>>argument for Ubuntu or any
>>
>>
>>>other Linux product, it is good to have the facts
>>>
>>>
>>right so credibility is
>>
>>
>>>not lost with WINDOWS users. Most WIN users know
>>>
>>>
>>they can update at any time
>>
>>
>>>they choose and they know they can talk with an MS
>>>
>>>
>>tech when appropriate.
>>
>>
>>>Do you believe that a free market, world wide,
>>>
>>>
>>would permit MS or any other
>>
>>
>>>company to enjoy a multi-billion USD monthly sales
>>>
>>>
>>volume without it
>>
>>
>>>providing products that people desire to have?
>>>
>>>
>=== message truncated ===
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list