So, why no Ruby Gems yet?

Fri Dec 1 08:38:19 UTC 2006

On Fri, 2006-01-12 at 01:59 -0500, Scott J. Henson wrote:

> Don't know why it wasn't done for edgy, but I have good news...

> scotth at wildfire:~$ apt-cache policy rubygems
> rubygems:
>   Installed: (none)
>   Candidate: 0.9.0-5
>   Version table:
>      0.9.0-5 0
>         500 http://archive.ubuntu.com feisty/universe Packages

Now that is good news.  Does anybody know of the prospects of a backport
to Edgy and/or Dapper?

-- 
Michael T. Richter
Email: ttmrichter at gmail.com, mtr1966 at hotpop.com
MSN: ttmrichter at hotmail.com, mtr1966 at hotmail.com; YIM:
michael_richter_1966; AIM: YanJiahua1966; ICQ: 241960658; Jabber:
mtr1966 at jabber.cn

"My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not
either to save or to destroy slavery." --Abraham Lincoln
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20061201/4472f8da/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20061201/4472f8da/attachment.sig>