So, why no Ruby Gems yet?

Michael T. Richter ttmrichter at gmail.com
Fri Dec 1 06:39:27 UTC 2006


I finally got around to installing Edgy on my testbed (and undoing some
of its obnoxious behaviour on installation like "correcting" all my boot
devices to be its partition....) and started to install the tools I
need/like/want.  One of those is Ruby 1.8.  I've noticed since Breezy
that Ruby Gems has not yet been packaged for Ubuntu and this confuses
me.  The fact that someone is packaging Ruby at all indicates that
someone, somewhere likes Ruby enough to go through the backflips.  Yet
I'd be hard-pressed to find a deep Ruby user who doesn't use Gems.  Is
there some technical reason I'm unaware of making Ruby Gems not get
packaged or is it a matter of missing manpower?

-- 
Michael T. Richter
Email: ttmrichter at gmail.com, mtr1966 at hotpop.com
MSN: ttmrichter at hotmail.com, mtr1966 at hotmail.com; YIM:
michael_richter_1966; AIM: YanJiahua1966; ICQ: 241960658; Jabber:
mtr1966 at jabber.cn

"My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not
either to save or to destroy slavery." --Abraham Lincoln
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20061201/8bb8e5ea/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20061201/8bb8e5ea/attachment.sig>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list