Transparency, Community? (was Re: List-Id Changed why? )

[Matthew East]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



* Derek Broughton:
> No, I won't tolerate your attempts to change the lists...
> 
> Matthew East wrote:
>> The simple facts are these - the mailing list description has been
>> amended to better reflect the original intentions for the list,
> 
> No, the "simple facts" are that you made a unilateral decision without any
> consultation with the people affected by it.

Just to clarify, this was not a unilateral decision, I prompted the list
administrator to make the change, based on what the Community Council
has approved, which in my view is the body that is able to determine
this sort of policy. (I understand that you disagree with that, but
that's my view.)

As for the rest, I think I've explained my view already, and you've
explained yours, we're not going to get much further there. We simply
disagree about the extent to which the list community takes these decisions.

Matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE9ysLtSaF0w5rBv8RAlcHAJ4tPMglOj2w7jx3eIURP51b6cgfmACffGAo
CiZaGOh56n3pMcs1xBb7KMo=
=4vRb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----