/opt is missing
Peter Garrett
peter.garrett at optusnet.com.au
Wed Aug 16 18:22:43 UTC 2006
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:06:20 +0200
Markus Schönhaber <ubuntu-users at schoenhaber.de> wrote:
> Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> > On 8/16/06, Markus Schönhaber <ubuntu-users at schoenhaber.de> wrote:
> > > Peter Garrett wrote:
> > > > Nevertheless, /opt should always be present, even if empty!
> > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > Because striving for standards compliance is generally considered a good
> > thing.
>
> I still don't get the point why the simple presence of an empty directory
> called "/opt" should be of any value.
> And could you elaborate a bit to which standard one does comply by
> creating "/opt"?
To quote Alan McKinnon from another post in this thread:
<quote> /opt is a mandatory dir according to FHS and it must
be there. </quote>
FHS: Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
See http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
and
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#OPTADDONAPPLICATIONSOFTWAREPACKAGES
Peter
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list