Why 6.06.1 ?

ruscook ruscook_oz at yahoo.com.au
Tue Aug 15 10:39:41 UTC 2006


I may be wrong but as 6.06 has the Long Term Support moniker attached to 
it's name, I'd say we need to remember updates are NOT a new release but 
a patch to the release 6.06. So the next VERSION of Ubuntu is 6.10 
(Edgy), but for a number of years, 6.06 will be maintained and updated 
as patch releases of the original 6.06. Probably a 6.06.1; 6.06.2 .... 
6.06.n etc.

This is not just semantics, but relates to what will be covered in the 
upgrades, what regression  and certification testing is expected etc.

Duncan Lithgow wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 14:22 +0200, Lean Fuglsang wrote:
>   
>> Den Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:10:27 +0700. skrev Ali Milis:
>>
>>     
>>> Why not 6.08 ?
>>> Why confuse lay people?
>>>       
>> I don't get why it is called 6.06.1 instead of 6.06LTS+6.08 or something.
>> When you have some discs floating around with e.g 6.06.4, then how new is
>> it? It could be a year or two old, so you have to start remembering
>> how old the numbers are.
>>     
> Probably you'd just go online and check for the current version number.
>
> duncan
>   

-- 
Kind Regards Russell
==================
www.windsorcycles.com.au
bikes.no-ip.info
Linux user #369094
================== 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060815/e63d97c3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ruscook_oz.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 127 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060815/e63d97c3/attachment.vcf>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list