Releasing with a known broken kernel (was: OT | was 6.06.1)

[Alexander Skwar]

· Thilo Six <T.Six at gmx.de>:
> Alexander Skwar wrote the following on 13.08.2006 16:51:

>> No problem at all. But if you, sort of, try to make me look like
>> I did not do my homework, than I expect, that you do your homework.
> 
> Sorry i can´t follow.
> What is offensive about to ask for details when somebody reports
> problems especially when i comes to the kernel?

Sorry, maybe I was a bit "thin skinned", but I was offended
by the *way* you asked. 

> A bugreport is the place where such things belongs.

Yep.

> ..and when we are at this issue.
> What is more offensive to ask for a bugreport or to say:
> 
>> Why did they make
>> it so, that the default kernel is unusable for many users
> 
> ?

What's more offensive: Asking a question the way I did
it or doing nothing (as it seems), although it's known
that many people will get problems, if nothing is done?
Now, don't make the failure to assume, that I'm talking
about my problems - I'm not. I stay with kernel -25 until
a useable kernel is released. I'm affraid, that Ubuntu
will be unuseable for many people, because of the wrong
choice to use -26 as the kernel on 6.06.1.

> At least i am one more not a part of the "many".

Congrats! ;) Do you use VIA hardware?

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Tadeln darf man keinen Abgeschiedenen; nicht was sie gefehlt und
gelitten, sondern was sie geleistet und getan, beschäftige die
Hinterbliebenen.
                -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (Biographische Einzelheiten)