making deborphan obsolete?

[Mario Vukelic]

On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 10:31 -0300, Derek Broughton wrote:
> it's always dpkg that actually does the install.  apt is the
> dependency resolver. 

I skip the rest, you have good points, but I still remember what I do.
Of course I can't find a reference supporting me in the Debian
documentation right now, and I can't be bothered to search mailing lists
from 1998 :)

Regarding the quoted line, we are arguing about definitions. To me the
relationship between apt-get and dpkg is not one that makes me call the
one a front-end to the other. For you it is. Not a problem.