making deborphan obsolete?

Chris Peterman kyral at ubuntu.com
Tue Apr 11 17:27:31 UTC 2006


And what exactly is wrong with Deborphan (and its GUI, GTKOrphan (I think 
thats the name)? Also, IIRC Aptitude already does this.


On Tuesday 11 April 2006 13:18, Lutzer wrote:
> Hi
>
> If I use synaptic (or apt-get) to install an application A a required
> library L is automatically installed as well. This is quite comfortable
> and a well known feature.
>
> I'm wondering why a similar feature does not exist for removing packages
> (AFAIK). If I decide later to remove application A than the former
> required library L remains in the system without any usage. I think it
> should be quite easy to implement such a feature in apt-get. (for
> instance: apt-get sets a flag to all packages which are installed
> because of dependencies to others. If a package is removed, all packages
> which were required by these package, have the flag and are not needed
> any more by another installed package are proposed to be removed as well.)
>
> Such a feature would cause a slim and clean system automatically to any
> newbie who is capable to use apt-get or synaptic for example.
>
> Lutz

-- 
~ Chris "Kyral" Peterman
Computer Science Undergraduate
Clarkson University
Associate Member of the Free Software Foundation
Ubuntu Member
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060411/8885b447/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list