Ubuntu's unstable vs Debian unstable

Shot - Piotr Szotkowski shot at hot.pl
Wed Nov 30 16:57:24 UTC 2005


Hello.

Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:

> From what I read on the lists it seems that Ubuntu's
> unstable is generally more broken than Debian's

It depends. Ubuntu has a 6 month release cycle, and early in the cycle
the 'unstable' (currently - Dapper) is generally broken, while near the
end of the cycle it usually works.

> making me feel safer using Sid.

I switched my laptop from Debian sid to Ubuntu Breezy (stable) around
a month ago, and can't wait for the moment I can switch my workstation
as well. What do you need from Debian sid that's not available in Ubuntu
stable reinforced by selected backports?

So far, I've backported for myself the following without a problem:
Dosage 1.5.5, Firefox 1.5, Gtodo 0.14+CVS, lighttpd 1.4.8, mc 4.6.1,
PHPPgAdmin 3.5.6, Quod Libet 0.15, Rails 0.14.3, Unison 2.13.16 and
X-Moto 0.1.8.

Cheers,
-- Shot
-- 
  I don't see what C++ has to do with keeping people from shooting themselves
  in the foot. C++ will happily load the gun, offer you a drink to steady
  your nerves, and help you aim.                            -- Peter da Silva
====================== http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ ===
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20051130/63037745/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list