Beta and Stable

Olafur Arason olafra at gmail.com
Tue Nov 1 07:47:46 UTC 2005


OpenOffice.org had delayed repeatatly the final release so it feel
after breezy was released. It had been comitted to releasing breezy
with OpenOffice.org 2, Suse was in the same situation as us with the
10 release.

Here is an email from ubuntu-devel:
----
Test packages for the final 2.0 release are available at

  deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/OOo2 ./

for amd64 and powerpc at

  deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/OOo2-amd64 ./
  deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/OOo2-powerpc ./

Please use the bug tracking system for feedback, but explicitely mention
the version number, or that you are using the test packages.

  Matthias

----

At least dapper will be with OpenOffice.org 2 packages. Also
technically the X.org packages had beta elements like the seperation,
so beta doesn't always say everything.

Olafur Arason

2005/11/1, David Walker <dave at mudsite.com>:
> I am not sure if this has been on this list or not, but I just wanted to
> say it to be sure.
>
> I am wondering why Breezy was released with not stable packages as
> default?  I am using openoffice 1.9.xxx instead of the, now stable 2.0.
> I know that 5.10 came out before OpenOffice released 2.0, but why did it
> not ship with the last stable release as the default.  If I was deciding
> to run Ubuntu in a lab or something, I would be very worried that your
> 'stable' contained beta default packages.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> --
> David Walker
> Computer Science House
> azrail at csh.rit.edu
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list