Reiserfs vs ext3

[Jason Straight]

On Monday 21 March 2005 16:57, n6 wrote:
> My general experence is:
>
> ReiserFS is very fast, but EXT3 is more stable, if your machine gets
> power off, with ReiserFS in mt experence  your gona have issues. but
> thats just my experiences.

Yeah, I agree. And with reiser fs corruption doesn't make much sense, usually 
it's just the open rw files that get hosed. But I've seen reiser mix up 
things like rc.local and main.cf for postfix even when the machine didn't go 
down.

-- 
http://www.skycon.net/
ICQ: 1796276
AIM: JasonRStraight
MSN: glock21-45cal at hotmail.com
OS: Ubuntu/Kubuntu Linux http://www.ubuntu.org/ http://www.kubuntu.org.uk/