Reiserfs vs ext3

Jason Straight jason at
Tue Mar 22 16:33:39 UTC 2005

On Monday 21 March 2005 16:57, n6 wrote:
> My general experence is:
> ReiserFS is very fast, but EXT3 is more stable, if your machine gets
> power off, with ReiserFS in mt experence  your gona have issues. but
> thats just my experiences.

Yeah, I agree. And with reiser fs corruption doesn't make much sense, usually 
it's just the open rw files that get hosed. But I've seen reiser mix up 
things like rc.local and for postfix even when the machine didn't go 

ICQ: 1796276
AIM: JasonRStraight
MSN: glock21-45cal at
OS: Ubuntu/Kubuntu Linux

More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list