interpreting memory usage
R Kimber
rkimber at ntlworld.com
Wed Jun 8 10:52:30 UTC 2005
Last night, after a reboot and after opening a few standard apps, free
gave
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem:2055816 482572 1573244 0 36560 179136
-/+ buffers/cache: 266876 1788940
Swap: 2104464 0 2104464
i.e. it seemed to be saying that 76.5% was free.
This morning, with the same apps remaining open, it gave
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem:2055816 1704252 351564 0 364044 248908
-/+buffers/ cache: 1091300 964516
Swap: 2104464 0 2104464
i.e. 17.1% free.
How should this be interpreted? It seems a big drop in "free"
memory, whatever that means, given that no new apps were started and I
did very little on the machine during the intervening period. The
buffers and cached went up from about 10% to 30%
Are there system/housekeeping processes running in the background that
aren't started at boot and that can take up such a large chunk of memory
(presumably around half a GB)? Or am I misinterpreting the
figures?
Subjectively I think that 5.04 uses more memory than its predecessor,
the desktop seems quite expensive in memory terms, and to get slower
after a while.
I ask this not because I'm concerned about the problem but because I'd
like to understand a little better (I normally use zero swap and I know
that linux manages memory well, though the slowdown is an issue that I
shall keep an eye on).
- Richard.
--
Richard Kimber
http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list