Ubuntu "Lite" :)
Steve Torrefranca
javacide at gmail.com
Sun Jul 17 10:13:41 UTC 2005
>http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=8338&page=10&pp=10
>
>
>
>
i read the thread and quite interesting someone asked the same question
that has been running around my head:
> Why not XFCE instead of icewm ?
why not. is there really a significant difference on memory usage
between xfce and icewm bec in terms of interface its Huge? i am sorry,
to me icewm is just butt ugly.
steve
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list