Ubuntu "Lite" :)

Steve Torrefranca javacide at gmail.com
Sun Jul 17 10:13:41 UTC 2005


>http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=8338&page=10&pp=10
>
>
>  
>
i read the thread and quite interesting someone asked the same question
that has been running around my head:

> Why not XFCE instead of icewm ?


why not.  is there really a significant difference on memory usage
between xfce and icewm bec in terms of interface its Huge? i am sorry,
to me icewm is just butt ugly.

steve




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list