Switching video cards : "HowTo" ??
Daniel Stone
daniel at fooishbar.org
Sun Jan 23 01:13:51 UTC 2005
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 10:52:11AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 08:47:59PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 12:57:26AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > With current Hoary, it's simpler, right? This definitely deserves a short
> > > how-to, though.
> >
> > ... no. But the variable name changed.
>
> It should be simpler. Perhaps XORG_FORCE_PROBE should ignore the md5sum
> check. It makes a backup anyway, no?
I don't believe it makes a backup.
> > This is a lot of insanity inherited from Debian, and while some parts of it are
> > utter crap (for instance, if you delete xorg.conf, it will not get reinstated --
> > wtf?), but I like some parts. If you change xorg.conf, your changes will be
> > respected and it will not get overwritten. If there's a way to tell if we're
> > running through dpkg-reconfigure or just reconfiguring through an upgrade,
> > though, it might be good to stomp the config file regardless, because this is
> > basically the only question I *ever* field about xorg's debconfiscation.
>
> dpkg-reconfigure passes "reconfigure" to the .config script, while during
> upgrades the argument is "configure".
OK, so would you be happy with always stomping the configuration file with
reconfiguring (but making a backup), and changing the default when reconfiguring
to probing, with a flag to explicitly disable it? That's what would make the
most sense to me. (Also, always recreating the file when it's deleted.)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20050123/563a6584/attachment.sig>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list