Debian or Ubuntu?
Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)
shot at shot.pl
Sun Jan 16 23:34:27 UTC 2005
Hello.
David:
> I did the servers AFTER the desktops and decided that
> Debian Sarge was the way to go. The reasons were:
>
> * Ubuntu is X oriented, and I didn't want X on the servers
So don't install it. Do a 'custom' install of Warty (or, better yet,
a custom-expert one), it only installs ubuntu-base and lets you fetch
the rest that you need.
Things to consider, though:
- Ubuntu supports (security-wise) Warty's main and
restricted, Debian doesn't support sarge at all yet;
- whe Debian finally supports sarge, it'll support all of
it (it'll be like Ubuntu supporting main and universe);
- if Ubuntu's team meet their deadlines Ubuntu will support Warty until
April 2006, Hoary between April 2005 and October 2006 and Grumpy
between October 2006 and April 2007 - this means there will be
supported and stable releases of new server software long before
etch sees the light of the day (etch = sarge+1);
- Ubuntu support Apache 2 while not supporting Apache 1.3.
I'd choose Ubuntu (Warty) over sarge for my server.
> I'm told that running X on a server is a *potential* security
> hole, and the axiom applies: if you don't need it, don't run it.
You don't even have to install it (or any of the
other dependencies of ubuntu-desktop for that matter).
Cheers,
-- Shot
--
I've got an inferiority complex, but it's not very good.
================================================ http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ ===
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20050117/49ab00b5/attachment.sig>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list