anyone got working "straw" packages for Hoary?

[Magnus Therning]

On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:41:08PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>Magnus Therning writes:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:28:28PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
>> >BTW one possible thing that might be worth noting as a "distro thing"
>> >rather than a single-package thing -- I found when I was attempting to
>> >build straw 0.25.1 that there were a lot of dependency packages
>> >required, and it was quite tricky to determine what the apt package's
>> >name would be, from the requested Python package's name.  in other
>> >words, it's not like perl, where a request for Mail::Audit means that
>> >you need to install libmail-audit-perl -- which, while obscure, is at
>> >least logical.
>> >
>> >Instead, to resolve a request for the python package "GObject", I had
>> >to go grepping through apt-cache search looking for
>> >GNOME/GTK+/glib-related python packages, and install a few "-dev" ones.
>> >This probably wouldn't have been an issue with a working apt-gettable
>> >package of course, but to a newbie at building python apps, it was
>> >quite tricky.
>> >
>> >I'm not quite sure what can be done here, since I think most of these
>> >are coming via universe, and I don't yet know what Ubuntu's policy is
>> >on renaming debian packages in Ubuntu.   But if possible, it might help
>> >if some "pseudo-packages" are created using something like the perl
>> >convention, which simply result in installing the correctly-named
>> >"python-foo-dev" package -- similar to how the ubuntu-calendar package
>> >works?  that, in my opinion, would help...
>> 
>> Wouldn't it be good to report missing build dependencies as a bug?
>> 
>> A quick look at the Build-Depends: in the source package compared to
>> the Depends: of the binary package suggests that the latter can be
>> used as a clue to improve on the former.
>
>in this case, though, I'm building from source tarball -- not from the
>source package.   I'd agree, if the src package leaves out build deps,
>that's definitely a package bug; but this case is slightly different.

I usually use http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents
whenever I need to find out where a certain file can be found.

It seems to work for Ubuntu as well :-)

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                    (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus at therning.org
http://magnus.therning.org/

Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.

Some operating systems are called 'user friendly', Linux however is
'expert friendly'.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20050113/d7e13148/attachment.sig>