Matt Philmon wrote:
> Will the next set of Mono packages be 1.0.6 or 1.1.4? Even the Mono
> project team is now recommending users use the development release as
> it's much better than the "stable" 1.0.6 version. I've built it from
> source but am having a very difficult time with gtk-sharp so that I can
> build the latest f-spot, blam, MonoDevelop, etc. It would be awesome if
> there was a package available "soon" to easy my pain. :)
>
> Matt
>
Matt
When you run gtk-sharp's autogen the Optional assemblies output needs to
look like this - straight from my ubuntu running 1.1.4.
configuration summary
* Installation prefix = /usr/local
* C# compiler: /usr/local/bin/mcs
Optional assemblies included in the build:
* art-sharp.dll: yes
* gnomevfs-sharp.dll: yes
* gnome-sharp.dll: yes
* glade-sharp.dll: yes
* gda-sharp.dll: yes
* gnomedb-sharp.dll: yes
* rsvg-sharp.dll: yes
* gtkhtml-sharp.dll: yes
* vte-sharp.dll: yes
* gtk-dotnet.dll: yes
NOTE: if any of the above say 'no' you may install the
corresponding development packages for them, rerun
autogen.sh to include them in the build.
If you want to run MonoDevelop then these assemblies are NOT optional.
See configure.in for details of versions required.
gtkhtml-sharp.dll gave me the most problems. configure.in says
GTKHTML_REQUIRED_VERSION=3.0.10 or greater - which means you need to
install libgtkhtml-3.0-4 & libgtkhtml-3.0-dev from universe.
Brian