....Reply-to-List in mutt

[David]

On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:28:25PM -0500, David M. Carney wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 19:50, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:25:19AM EST, David wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 01:04:54PM -0500, Michael R Head wrote:
> > > > > Whenever the subject comes up, it makes me appreciate the versatility
> > > > > of mutt.
> > > >
> > > > Don't you have to tell mutt in the .muttrc that you are subscribing to
> > > > each list to which you subscribe in order to get the reply-to-list to
> > > > work? That's one of the reasons I stopped using mutt several years ago.
> > > > (but maybe that's changed in recent times?)
> > >
> > > I'm NOT a power user of mutt. In fact i've only just started using it,
> > > but shift-L replies to a list without changing .muttrc.
> >
> > I don't think so. If I try and do what you state above, I get the
> > message no mailing lists found. I don't have any mailing lists defined.
> >
> > I personally find it easier to simply add the mailing lists to my
> > aliases file so I can refer to them with an alias. Saves having to
> > constantly edit .muttrc when adding myself to a mailing list.


this email is a result of shift-L. I don't even know HOW to define mailing 
lists for mutt ;-) 

I've looked in the .muttrc file and there is nothing there about defining 
lists. Maybe you have something in your muttrc that's actually creating a 
problem?