Gnome or KDE?

[Patrik Dahl]

Ooouuuchhh, don't even try to dare to go that dark corner of the 
Universe and respawn the most ancient and holy flamewar of all times 
because we all ofcourse know that...is better than... ;-)

 >Can we all at least agree that vi is better than emacs?

//PDa

Karl wrote:

>I've used them both, find them both excellent products, but personally
>prefer Gnome over KDE.
>
>Can we all at least agree that vi is better than emacs?
>
>*runs*
>
>
>On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 20:24 +0300, audriusb at homelan.lt wrote:
>  
>
>>Quoting mbuel76 <ulist at gs1.ubuntuforums.org>:
>>I was working with KDE long before GNOME was born and I agree that KDE was
>>better than GNOME but once upone time UNIX users community selected GNOME as
>>main desktop because of license issues which existed in KDE that time.
>>Now KDE became free, but play was lost: GNOME got good support from Ximian and
>>programmers, who spent long time at GNOME studies will never back to KDE.
>>
>>Gediminas Bukauskas
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Car analogy:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Gnome is like the stripped down Kia that doesn't come with any options,
>>>and even with options it's not that attractive or intuitive but manages
>>>to get the job done.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>KDE is a Fully loaded Subaru.  It comes with a whole load of options
>>>including alot of stuff you don't really need.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I myself prefer KDE, and strip it down to the options I want using the
>>>awesome apt system.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>that's my opinion of it, GNOME doesn't fit me KDE does.
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>mbuel76
>>>
>>>--
>>>ubuntu-users mailing list
>>>ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>