Some good control version?

[Stuart Bishop]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Erik Bågfors wrote:
> The slowness is not a problem on small to medium projects. I've been
> using darcs for some time and never had this problem. However, I
> wouldn't move a really large project to it.

We use Bazaar internally for large projects, and seems to have all the
benefits of Darcs except for a Windows build (I'm sure the Bazaar team would
love to hear from people who can help with that).

http://bazaar.canonical.com/

> I think bazaar-ng is the future but it's not ready yet.

Yup. But I suspect 'future' in the case of Bazaar-NG is closer than most
people expect given its rapid pace of development. It has already become
self hosting and being used by the brave, but I suspect most developers will
be happier starting with Bazaar and following its stable releases until it
turns into Bazaar-NG.

http://www.bazaar-ng.org/

- --
Stuart Bishop <stuart.bishop at canonical.com>   http://www.canonical.com/
Canonical Ltd.                                http://www.ubuntu.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCX33kAfqZj7rGN0oRAmRGAJ4mSIzUGUnZsH8kegkcY1bcsG9xpgCaAtHG
S4UhY4jb9UXkOIk0gqvW4vM=
=QNPO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----