Oh Boy....

[audriusb at homelan.lt]

Quoting Greg Rothenberger <grothenberger at mac.com>:

Don't fall into religious war: there are no excellent or bad Linuxes. There is a
distribution which you know better than other ones and it is the best one for
you.  I came to Debian from RedHat. Debian stable is not for me, because it
uses 1-2 year old packages, very old in Linux world. But if you are looking for
inexpencive mail, SQL or LDAP server, Debian Stable will be main candidade: all
packages are on hand and they are cearfully tested.

Gediminas Bukauskas

> Well, I'm not terribly sure it matters to me. Ubuntu works for me. Debian
> never did. While I can play around with the OS and different settings (much
> more so than the average desktop user), I'm basically a desktop user. Ubuntu
> does what I want it to, without having to google setups for things I don't
> yet know how to do. If any distribution of linux is going to make headway
> with the average user, that's one thing it's going to have to do. If Debian
> is unable to do it, the average user will find a distribution that can.
>
> Greg
>
> On Monday, April 11, 2005, at 08:47PM, David M. Carney <carney1979 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Looks like Ian Murdock isn't too happy with Ubuntu's package system....
> >
>
>http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/11/2335221&tid=163&tid=90&tid=190&tid=106
> >
> >David
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>