Skype is not free software
santiago_erquicia at yahoo.com.ar
Thu Sep 23 23:12:44 UTC 2004
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 23:20 +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 19:58 +0100, sparkes wrote:
> > ah, you have misunderstood the use of the word free here. The previous
> > poster meant free as in freedom. the following links might help you see
> > the subtule difference that can lead to flamewars ;-)
> > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/ for the reasons behind freesoftware and
> > http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php for the slightly easier to
> > understand concept of open source software.
> Precisely; my comment was in reference to people asking for it to be in
> universe, which afaik is only 100% free (as in freedom) software.
I'm sorry but this thread started because I was having problems with
this program and a few days ago Marc Shuttleworth sent an email that you
can find on the archives (http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
users/2004-September/001450.html) where he was saying he would like to
put it in universe. He said so after I sent the EULA link and an
extract of it where it says the requirements for redistribution.
> (I like skype and will probably be using it in a few weeks time, that's
> not the point ;)
I would prefer to have it so I can install it easily but if it doesn't
make it into a repository I will just install it by hand. It is
actually the only program that I can use easily to talk to my parents
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2141 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ubuntu-users