cdrecord???

[David Williamson]

On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 17:59 -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:

> Funny you should ask. :-)
> 
> The only reason it was ever thought of as a SCSI device was because of
> cdrecord's brain damage.

If you don't like cdrecord, don't hold back - lemme know  :)

I understand that it had to treat ATAPI drives as scsi for some reason,
which always struck me as odd, but after a while it became "normal."
Now, with ubuntu, things don't work this way.  So, is that because of
udev?  Just changes with cdrecord?  The new kernel?  Something else
altogether?  

dave