common lisp

[Keith Irwin]

On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 19:35 -0500, John Hornbeck wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 15:47 -0700, Keith Irwin wrote:
> > Alas, but they all need a lisp compiler, such as sbcl, which doesn't
> > seem to appear with apt-get, apt-cache, etc. If I surf to
> > pool/.../s/sbcl, I see a tarball, a dsc, etc.

> > Can I expect this to be fixed at some point?  Is it even broken?  Is
> > there someone I can ping about it?
 
> Have you tried gcl?  I know that is in Warty.

I don't think it's a complete implementation of CL, nor does it fit with
all the other packages.

Does stuff like this ever get fixed in "universe," or can I just write
off using apt-get with sbcl/cmucl with ubuntu?  (I mean, I can install
it from a tarball, like I do on fedora, so _that's_ not the issue.)

Just wondering how things work is all.

Thanks,

Keith