Linux Stand Alone Database?

[Christoph Sturm]

i think one of the design goals of rekall is to be a kind of an
enhanced access clone for linux. i am not sure about filemaker, but
access definately supports using external databases. and if rekall
supports sqllite it should just work like access with internal
database. I am not at all sure how well it works, but i think rekall
is the app you want.

have a nice time
 chris  


On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:31:04 -0400, Brett Kirksey
<ubuntu-users at valx.mailshell.com> wrote:
> On Monday 11 October 2004 at 08:14+0900, Jan Morén wrote:
> 
> > Why embedded, exactly? Don't you rather mean "no need for DB
> > administration"? So if a DB is installed as just another
> > dependency of the app, and is automagically run with sensible
> > no-need-to-touch defaults, that is just as good as
> > "embedded", yes?
> 
> Because I'm looking for a FileMaker/Access type app, and that's
> how they do it. People can argue the ups and downs of it all
> day, but I just want to know if there exists something on the
> Linux platform like FileMaker/Access on Windows and Mac. Linux
> may not have it, and it may have something different and
> "better". But I'm just looking for a FileMaker type counterpart
> that is closest in structure and functionality.
> 
> Brett
> 
> 
> 
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> 


-- 
christoph.sturm at gmail.com