how to boot without X
John
dingo at coco2.arach.net.au
Wed Oct 6 21:58:54 UTC 2004
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:52:56AM +0800, John wrote:
>
>
>>A runlevel in which X doesn't start is the way others do it. It's a way
>>that users coming from other distroes are familiar with and I recommend it
>>be done in Ubuntu.
>
>
> Users who are accustomed to dealing with UNIX idiosyncrasies such as
> runlevels can customize their systems this way.
They can, but OTOH I've never seen the point of shipping with four
runlevels all the same.
I suspect not a lot of Linux users are in fact also Unix users.
>
>
>>I have one system that locks up whenever I run KDE (KDM or a desktop) on
>>the hardware. Booting to (Red Hat's) runlevel 3 would have been fine -
>>everything except KDM would start.
>
>
> Likewise for the "recovery mode" boot provided by default in Ubuntu.
recovery mode is unsuitable for that machine.
>
There are other reasons to not run a display-manager at boot. Some like
a GUI on their servers, but that's not to say they want to start a
display manager on boot. Most of my servers are headless, but a GUI
login is possible using VNC.
Specifying whether to start X on boot is easier on RHL than on Debian.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list