PCI Wireless Network Card
John
dingo at coco2.arach.net.au
Mon Nov 8 10:58:27 UTC 2004
adi zebic wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 04:52:04 +0800, John <summer at computerdatasafe.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>>Avoid TI and Broadcom. Avoid anything that requires ndiswrapper.
>
>
> Why avoid Broadcom? Why avoid ndiswrapper?
> I have one Broadcom chipset based card that is 100% supported under
> linux (wep etc) with ndiswrapper. Can you explain?
Do you want Windows software in your Linux computer?
In principle, if a driver for which I have source is broken then I can
fix it. Or I can file a bug report and my Linux vendor can fix it.
Any device which lacks a Linux driver is one to avoid buying. If you
have one because you bought it for use with Windows, then by all means
use ndiswrapper. I have no objection to ndiswrapper, just to the vendors
whose hardware requires it.
There are vendors who use wireless chipsets from manufacturers who
support Linux. Those are the products we should be supporting.
TI and Broadcom don't help us; let's not help them. I have a Powerbook
17 (came with my job). If I want to run Linux on it and use wireless, I
need to buy another card.
Mostly, when I email an OSS developer about a problem with his software
I get a reply within hours. What's your experience with vendors of
commercial software?
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list