IBM Java
Werner Punz
werpu at gmx.at
Mon Dec 27 23:30:54 UTC 2004
crimsun at fungus.sh.nu wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 06:43:22PM +0100, Werner Punz wrote:
>
>>In my opinion the speed is about the same nowadays but the IBM JDK has
>>more bugs than Suns reference implementation.
>
>
> My experience with both implementations and computations has been the
> opposite; the IBM version (comparing 1.4.x, not 1.5.0) has a more
> efficient gc and crypto methods.
>
>
Could be I never did really dive that much into it, but the last time I
used the IBM JDK it was for an installation I had to program against an
RS6000 that was around half a year ago, I did not recognize a
substantial difference in speed between both two (unlike moving from Sun
to Blackdown where Blackdown always seems to win on the same version number)
But one thing really struck me was that there was a slight bug in the
IBM interpreter which caused a severe error on a grammatically correct
construct. Ok given the number of lines that really was a 1:500.000
chance that you run into that, but it was kindof weird and left a bad
taste in my mouth regarding the bugs.
But as I said that one was half a year ago and on an IbM 1.4.x JDK, the
application afterwards after working around that JVM issue ran fine on
the RS6000 which I never saw before the first install of the application.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list