Apache2 questions

[Eric Dunbar]

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:04:18 +0100, Alf-Ivar Holm
<alfh at student.matnat.uio.no> wrote:
> "Drew, Bill" <drewwe at MORRISVILLE.EDU> writes:
> 
> > Dumb question and maybe wrong place to ask it, but why isn't the
> > documentation for apache2 changed to show the new names of commands?
> 
> Either the apache2 documentation is wrong, or the Ubuntu(/Debian?) way
> of packaging apache2 renames the programs without uppdating the HTML
> documentation?  The reason might be that some users want to run both
> Apache version 1 and 2 at the same time, so the need for distinct
> names is reasonable.

I know people who swear by Apache (httpd ;) 1.3 and swear at Apache
2.0. A lot of things were changed with the introduction of 2.0, not
the least being introduction of  many instabilities (bug fixes and
security updates are still being made to the 1.3 code-base).

Eric.